Reasons Why I Believe in God: It all began with a book recommendation…

Reasons Why I Believe in God

It all began with a book recommendation…

I  have condensed my whole site into this one page. These 11 books have the reasons for my beliefs. There are also online books and articles below if you want to know the same information for free.  Click on a few links and read the reviews that others have written on Amazon. You might be surprised:

My top 11 Favorite books:


The Young Earth by John D. Morris, PhD
The author, a geological engineer, describes the geological systems of the earth and shows that they have been made within thousands, not millions, of years.



By Design: Evidence for Nature’s Intelligent Design – The God of the Bible by Dr. Jonathan Safarti,
Dr. Jonathan Safarti, a chess champion, as well as a scientist, uses logic, as well as science, to talk about aspects in living things with indicate the need for a designer.  This book is about “Intelligent Design”, but by a Christian




Darwin’s Black Box: : The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution by Michael J. Behe
The author is a biochemist at Lehigh University. He examines the cell close up and describes all of the inner workings. He compares the cell to a large city with food delivery and trash pickup. He coins the term "irreducible complexity" and concludes that life on earth was intelligently designed.




Darwin’s Enigma by Luther D. Sunderland
In 1859, in the book Origin of the Species, Charles Darwin said: "Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms". Now over 100 years later, Sutherland wrote letters to at the world’s largest museums and asked each one what fossils of transitional forms they had in their collections. None of the paleontologists had a fossil of a transitional form.



Bones of Contention: A Creationist Assessment of Human Fossils by Marvin L. Lubenow
This book analyzes all of the hominid fossils. The appendix has a very detailed discussion of the dating of the fossil skull KNM-ER 1470. The science journal "Nature" is where the researchers published their research regarding this skull and their papers in "Nature" are quoted extensively. According to the many quotes from "Nature" it took a period of ten years to date this one fossil skull. This skull caused a big controversy in the scientific community and that’s why it took ten years for them to agree. This ten year process is detailed step by step using the words of the researchers, themselves. There were many dates given by the various radiometric dating techniques. The scientists could not agree on the "right" date of the many that were given by the various techniques. The author shows that a lot of the science related to the fossils and evolution is subjective.


Buried Alive: The Startling Truth About Neanderthal Man by Jack Cuozzo
The author, an orthodontist, went all over Europe into the back rooms of the largest museums and examined actual fossil skulls of Neanderthals. Most museums only have cast copies of the skulls and most scientists have never seen a real one. He got permission to x-ray the skulls and there are pictures in the book. He shows that the skulls have been put together improperly with the jaw jutting out. Because of the belief in evolution the jaw has been put in a more ape like fashion in all Neanderthal skulls. Then, these improperly assembled skulls were copied and sent museums all over the world.


Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution is Wrong by Jonathan Wells, Jody F. Sjogren
This book talks about the supposed evidence for evolution as taught in text books. The author describes in detail the Miller-Urey experiment, Darwin’s tree of life, Darwin’s finches, the horse series, Haeckel’s embryos, peppered moths, and several other topics. This author is one of the men interviewed in the book above entitled Case for a Creator: The: A Journalist Investigates Scientific Evidence That Points Toward God



Case for a Creator: The: A Journalist Investigates Scientific Evidence That Points Toward God by Lee Strobel
The author was an atheist journalist. When his wife became a Christian he went all over the USA and interviewed scientists and others about why they believed in God. After a period of time he came to believe in God and became a Christian, too. This book has the interviews that convinced him. Two of the men he interviewed, Jonathan Wells ( Icons of Evolution:: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution is Wrong ) and Michael Behe (Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution ), wrote books that are on this reading list. My story is similar to Strobel’s. I was so excited to see that God’s existence can be proven scientifically I made this website to tell others.


In Six Days: Why Fifty Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation Edited by John F. Ashton PhD.
Read "In Six Days" Online
This might be my favorite of all the books on this list. The editor compiled papers by fifty scientists. Each chapter is by a different scientist who gives aspects from each field that cannot be explained by purely physical means. Each scientist gives the reasons why he believes that God created the universe, the earth, plants and animals in six days as the Bible book of Genesis describes. It has detailed scientific explanations. There is a sequel to this book entitled On the Seventh Day:: Forty Scientists and Academics Explain Why They Believe in God which is listed below.


On the Seventh Day: Forty Scientists and Academics Explain Why They Believe in God Edited by John F. Ashton PhD.
This is the sequel to the book In Six Days: : Why Fifty Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation discussed above. Forty scientists and academics explain why they believe in God



Many Infallible Proofs: Evidences for the Christian Faith by Henry M. Morris
This book has many scientific evidences for the belief in God. It discusses evidence for a world wide flood which caused the fossil record and the large amount of buried foliage that became gas, coal and oil. It has a chapter on The Bible and Science which lists things that were in the Bible before science knew about it, including the circulation of blood, the water cycle, the shape of the earth and the number of stars. The Bible verses for each are listed.



(Disclaimer: I am set up with as an Amazon Associate. They pay a very small percentage of sales to the person who hosts links to I have a couple of dollars on credit. But, as they only cut checks in $100 increments, I can honestly say I have never made any money on the sale of any book I recommend, and I never expect to in the future. The only reason I am set up this way  is because it is the only way I can ever know if anybody ever buys a book I recommend.)

From as far back as I can remember, I was taught that life on earth came about by a process of time and chance. It was all I had ever known.

In 1996 I met some people who told me the scientific evidence does not support what I had always believed. Of course, I knew that they were ignorant. What I believed was scientific! What did they know!

But, they were very confident in what they believed. They basically dared me to read a book to see if they were right. I fought it for months, but, I ended up deciding that it wouldn’t hurt to read just one skinny book that they recommended.

So here I am paying money to have a website just to tell people why I believe in God. If you want to know what happened between then and now, check out My Testimony.

When I say at I am an ex-evolutionist, I am using the term “evolution” only as the supposed major changes from the beginning of life: Fish to amphibians to reptiles to mammals and birds.

Most of what people call “evolution” can more accurately be called genetics – variation within species. Creationists have no disagreement with the fact that there can be variety within types of animals, different sized beaks in Darwin’s finches, for instance. The only question is whether those small variations show that all live forms are related. See my page: What is a Species?.

There is a lot of misinformation about what a creationist believes. I’m going to try to explain part of it here. First off, not all scientists are evolutionists. Many scientists who believe in God as creator do research and publish their work in peer reviewed scientific journals. (If somebody tells you otherwise, they are misinformed or dishonest.)

However, scientists who believe in creation cannot publish evidence that disproves evolution in “peer reviewed” scientific journals as the peers who do the reviewing are evolutionists. If you are reading this website, you probably do not believe in God as creator and reject creation. Does that prove it false? No. The evolutionists who peer review the journals similarly reject any articles which are against evolution.

But, to a Bible believing creationist, it is irrelevant if a journal run by evolutionists does not print an article opposing evolution. That would make sense, wouldn’t it? It is no different than if a magazine about cats, peer reviewed by cat lovers, rejected articles saying that dogs are better than cats. It is their belief. It is not a fact.

So, what happens to the scientific articles that creationists write that disprove evolution? Do they get thrown away? No, they get published as books. Like all scientific papers, they have profuse quotes from articles in peer reviewed scientific journals. In fact, some of the published information in the evolutionist science journals actually will support a creationist view.

For instance, evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould published  "The Return of Hopeful Monsters," in Natural History, vol. 86 (June/July 1977). In this article, he says there is insufficient evidence to support the theory of evolution in the fossil record.

He said this because he was promoting a new theory of evolution called Punctuated Equilibrium. But, that theory says that evolution happened in giant leaps, instead of small steps, leaving no evidence. A creationist would say that there is no evidence for evolution in the fossil record because evolution did not happen.

Since I was recommended that first, skinny book, I have read many more. If you want to see the whole list see my page: Book List. These are not all of the books I have read on this topic, but they are that I recommend most wholeheartedly. That list of recommended books was getting so long, that I have decided to condense all of my recommendations into the books listed above.

Online Resources

The following items may be read in their entirety online:


The Answers Book
One Blood: The Biblical Answer to Racism
In Six Days: Why 50 Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation
Refuting Evolution
Refuting Evolution 2
Why Won’t They Listen?


Adam’s Rib: Creation & the Human Body
Does Carbon Dating Disprove the Bible?
Evidence for a Young World
Is There Intelligent Life in Outer Space?
The Seven C’s of History
Six Days or Millions of Years?
Where Did Cain Get His Wife?
Where Did the ‘Races’ Come From?
What Really Happened to the Dinosaurs?
Why Is There Death & Suffering


Online Creation Videos

(Reasons why I believe in God – Home page, no tables)

Share with Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, StumbleUpon, etc

Sign Up For Alerts   All Things Live   Coffee Talk Group   Lost Group

      Hey, X! Why do you believe in God?


Filed under My Faith

9 responses to “Reasons Why I Believe in God: It all began with a book recommendation…

  1. Karthick

    A nice read and you\’ve obviously done your homework but I think you\’ll agree that almost everyone believes in some kind of a creating force. Time didn\’t just \’happen\’; some force had to set the big bang off.But whether this Creator is a God who watches over us everyday is a bit hard to fathom, well for me atleast. Even if there was God who listens to prayers, I believe we\’re far too insignificant for Him to even care about us. When you think how mind-blowingly vast space is, our planet is nothing special. But of course our planet has life but I think its generally agreed that it will only be a matter of time before we find other lifeforms in other planets. So there. My two pence.

  2. X-Evolutionist

    Hi Karthick: I appreciate your point of view. It is hard to fathom. You said: "I believe we\’re far too insignificant for Him to even care about us."The thing is, God created us because he wanted to be with us, and he made the earth for us. X

  3. Horst

    Hi X, I remember something that was said by Catholics (An organization created by Roman Emporer Constantine), that the Earth is flat, and if you said it wasn\’t you were burned or stoned to death. Now you know that the bible was created by Roman Catholics, and rewritten to fit what they wanted you to believe. Creationist also say that all the animals and other life on earth was created for man to plunder.

  4. X-Evolutionist

    Hi Horst. Thank you for the overview of the situation as you see it. However, the Bible refers to this planet as "the circle of the earth". Bible believers have always known the earth was round. X

  5. Mandy

    Sorry X that statement just isn\’t true, Bible believers in the Americas, may have always believed the world was round, that\’s because the arriving there, proved that it was round, elsewhere in the world, and up until that time, it was believed by everybody, (barring one or 2 Scientists) to be flat! A circle is 2 dimensional, flat, but also their eyes told them it was flat too!

  6. X-Evolutionist

    Mandy: What you believe is a common misconception that has been used to discredit believers for many years. I understand why you believe it to be true: It is one of those "everybody knows……" things that gets passed around year after year after year, but nobody bothers to find out if it is true …. X:Who invented the idea of a flat Earth? Bible writers believe the earth was flat?

  7. Mandy

    Sorry X but nothing in either of those links, upholds your comment to be true, " Bible believers have always known the earth was round." (which infers all bible believers,) only a handful of examples of scientific christian men were given, over centuries, which is a hell of long way short of "Bible believers in general" I pointed out "barring one or 2 scientists" Unless you have a link that includes a poll of 2nd to 14th century, general public which clearly shows the statement to be true. You\’ve, in fact done the same as you have accused me of, "everybody knows…"

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s